Request Demo
To request a demo login,
please fill out and submit the information in the
request form

Innerlife STS Diagram
The Innerlife STS System is a cloud-based mental health clinical platform that creates and composes conceptualized narratives and builds them into professional-grade reports. These reports are designed for use by primary care physicians, mental health clinicians, and justice system professionals and include Mental Health Assessment Reports, Mental Health Treatment Reports, and Forensic Evaluation Reports.
read more

Innerlife STS is organized around research-established principles that have been scientifically demonstrated to evoke positive changes.
read more



Innerlife STS Clinical Supervision Study

The Innerlife STS System was recently used to complete a study on Clinical Supervisions. The results of the study were presented at the 2014 APA annual convention in Hawaii. The study was conducted at The Gronowski Center, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California

The Innerlife STS System is a cloud-based platform for Treatment Reports, Analytics, Outcome Tracking, and Documentation for mental health care. Innerlife STS creates and composes conceptualized narratives and builds them into professional-grade reports. These reports are designed for use by primary care physicians, mental health clinicians, and justice system professionals and include Mental Health Assessment Reports, Mental Health Treatment Reports, and Forensic Evaluation Reports.

The study included 8 Evidence-Based Principles in Supervision Trainings. The following represents preliminary findings from the first subjects (therapists, supervisors, and clients) in the study. Participants were:

  • Professor Larry E. Beutler, Ph.D., Principal Investigator
  • Satoko Kimpara, Ph.D., Project Director
  • Nancy Haug, Ph.D.
  • Sandra Macias, Ph.D.
  • Nichole Shiloff, Ph.D.,
  • Peter Goldblum, Ph.D.
  • Rainey Sealey Temkin, M.A.

The gap between what is taught inside the classrooms of research faculty and what is experienced in clinical supervision is a frequent concern of both psychology accrediting bodies and students themselves. 

Programs which value the use of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies often find it difficult to ensure that therapist trainees are providing optimal treatments, given there are more than 150 “empirically effective” treatments.

Beutler et al. (1990, 2000, 2006) established empirically derived principles (i.e., Systematic Treatment Selection; STS) to guide the therapeutic work, cut across therapeutic models, and allow diverse groups of psychotherapists to describe and apply their methods through a common language.

In the current study, we constructed a model designed to facilitate supervision through teaching and illustrating principles of effective change in the supervisory process.

The purpose of this preliminary study is: 1) to assess satisfaction of supervision trainings for supervisors and student therapists; 2) to determine study feasibility and; 3) to pilot procedures for a larger efficacy study in a psychology training clinic serving community mental health clients.


Impairment Level Principle   

1. For all patients with moderate to severe impairment, the therapist should identify social service or medical care needs and arrange for attention to these needs.  Those with low social support systems, in particular, need assistance from the therapist to develop social support and support services.  This may mean the use of adjunctive group or multi-person interventions.

Relationship Principles

2. Therapy is likely to be beneficial if a strong working alliance is established and maintained during the course of treatment. 
3. The qualities of a good working alliance are likely to be facilitated if the therapist relates to clients in an empathic way, adopts an attitude of caring, warmth, and acceptance, and an attitude of congruence or authenticity.
4. Therapists are likely to resolve alliance ruptures when addressing such ruptures in an empathic and flexible way.

Resistance Principles

5. In dealing with the resistant client, the therapist's use of directive therapeutic interventions should be planned to inversely correspond with the patient's manifest level of resistant traits and states.  Non-confrontational strategies are most helpful in working with such clients.

Coping Style Principles

6. Clients whose personalities are characterized by relatively high “externalizing” styles (e.g., impulsivity, social gregariousness, emotional liability, and external blame for problems), benefit more from direct behavioral change and symptom reduction efforts, including building new skills and managing impulses, than they do from procedures that are designed to facilitate insight and self-awareness.
7. Clients whose personalities are characterized by relatively high “internalizing” styles (e.g., low levels of impulsivity, indecisiveness, self-inspection, and overcontrol) tend to benefit more from procedures that foster self-inspection, self-understanding, insight, interpersonal attachments, and self-esteem than they do from procedures that aim at directly altering symptoms and building new social skills.

Readiness Principle

8. Clients who are in more advanced stages of readiness for change (e.g., preparation, action, maintenance) are more likely to improve in psychotherapy than those at lower stages of readiness (pre-contemplation, contemplation).



  • Participants who signed consent included: student trainees (n=43), supervisors (n=10), and clients (n=18) for 8 weeks. The final numbers reported here include: 25 student trainees, 6 supervisors and 18 clients (7-completed the study, 9-on going, and 2 attrition -1 client and 1 supervisor).
  • Prior to recruiting clients, supervisors and students were trained on eight evidence-based principles, all of which have produced strong evidence associated with effective treatment (Norcross, 2011).
  • Supervisors received 8 sessions of training and students received 2 sessions. Learning evaluations, completed by students and supervisors post-training, were used to assess the effectiveness of the trainings (see Table 1).
  • The Outcomes Questionnaire-45 (Lambert & Burlingame, 1996) was used to assess client progress over the 8-week study period (Figure 1), during which supervisors and student therapists implemented STS.
  • Study feasibility was captured through an evaluation designed to assess student therapist feedback after study completion (see Table 2).



Table 1. Post-Training Satisfaction Survey

(1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4= Very good, 5= Excellent) 



Figure 1. OQ-45 Client Scores

Results are based on benchmarking observed pre-post effect size estimates against treatment efficacy (see Minami et al. 2009). Six of 7 cases demonstrated large effect size estimates (d=.96-1.15) through session 8. Case 1 was a client with a long-standing schizophrenia diagnosis. (n=7)



Table 2. Post-Study Evaluation





• Student feedback indicated that evidence-based supervision helped with case conceptualization, addressing client resistance, selecting treatments based on internalizing and externalizing factors, a clearer sense of diagnostic and treatment interventions, treatment flexibility based on specific client characteristics, and valuable assessment information that may have otherwise been missed in initial interview. 

• Researchers plan on recruiting 50 more cases this Fall, 2014.






Innerlife STS:

  • Supports the clinician's thinking about how best to prescribe mental health treatment for a particular patient
  • Automatically generates a mental health assessment and treatment narrative
  • Automatically generates the Patient Psychological Evaluation designed for use by judges, lawyers, and the entire law enforcement system
  • Automatically generates the complete documentation package necessary for reimbursement by insurance companies and government-sponsored health programs
  • Tracks treatment outcomes over the full treatment lifetime of clients
  • Stores historical assessment reports and outcomes to fully support audits
ABOUT Innerlife
Science Advisors
Management Team
Contact Innerlife
Scientific Background
Product Diagram
Innerlife STS Technology
Development History
Request Demo
© Copyright Notice: Copyright 2006-2015 WebPsych Corp. All rights reserved.   |   Contact Us  |   Terms of Use Stay Connected:   
User Login Member Home Sign Off